THREE DAYS BEFORE THE CHANGE ...

http://zogarok.wordpress.com/2012/05/13/trois-jours-avant-le-changement/

13

May

Holland already scuttled the mirage

Barely elected, Holland has already made impotent, discredited his plans and his posture alternative shot. Following the results of insolent Legislative Greek, a stock exchange in a market panic and skeptical, the figures in the news openly seek to transfer national sovereignty to the European Union. Meanwhile, commentators labeled legitimize taken entrenched positions of leadership applying the neoliberal vision of economy and politics, the only massively taught both through the media that ambitious curricula. Those who should be the observers are spokesmen, presumably not entirely made aware of their character sheep-and proselytizing.

-

More than ever, Europe is regimented by the German federal state is benefiting more than others, in establishing a supranational Union and ardently defended its interests (as the euro currency and is enshrined in it was formalized as its currency earlier). Ambassador to Brussels and dogmatic Europeanists, Merkel comes suppress alternative and deny the authority of a head of state on his own country. Revision of the Stability Pact? It is not, and this "non-negotiable" the Iron Lady replaces the German "There is no alternative" which sealed, perhaps without knowing how, the ascendancy of an implacable logic. Anyway, Holland did not ask any condition, "no" is all the more easy it is to counteract a posture torn, or failing to explain the how or the post. It's the same for the ideal of "growth" portmanteau word in fashion in recent days, but never folded concept planned by him and his team.

-

And meanwhile, Holland enjoys the brilliance of Corrèze, managed to climb to one of their "highest office" (as one might proclaim, rightly, a few decades ago) for the second time. On the sidelines, he slips on his family and colleagues that the situation of Europe, the election in Greece and the prospects for radical recession worries him, and besides, he trusted the solutions that are exposed by the leaders of the Brussels technocracy and their associates, the neoliberal school of economists.

-

This is a new President moved with his career, while having to leave their assigned Corrèze, which is offered to the sight of the French. The oligarchy is incapable of full and there a beautiful incarnation a lambda type who, like us, will be a spectator of our history and whose groans will not even be audible to the makers of our destiny.

-

-

-

Diversion by the customs

And what Holland huddles there already? On societal reforms, customs, and the application of humanistic principles involved but free, egalitarian symbols. So there will be perfect parity in the Government, for the first time and then soon the marriage "gay" (there is little talk, if ever, of "gay marriage").

-

Obama became enamored of the subject recently ... At a time when the neoliberal empire is upset and that people now have means rumbling (but with the tools they are given), the Head of State of first power of the World was one evoking homosexual civil unions, a theme that could be addressed by a wink ... But the liberal left Democrat's interest to push the societal reforms, because they guarantee him a fight and sheepishly backbone, while opponents "conservative" traditionalists odious blocking progress and individual freedoms. There is a second reason is that once married homosexuals, they have more, like heterosexual married and in a social equivalent of interest to be lulled into a litany of neoliberal consensus servants.

The UMP is good, Cope is at the helm

Cope said of Holland that it is an "eel" but Cope himself is an eel; methods, personalities and perspectives contrasting but even eel qd! After the end of the presidential elections, the leader of the UMP has had the good sense to take the program for the Sarkozy campaign Legislative, remains to be seen how the two electoral adventures will meet or contradict.

-

Paradoxically, this program without the unpopular outgoing President, loses his best spokesperson. Cope, poorly defined, is not, at present, coherent ideological positions in any, since it is known more as a defender of the established order teaser and the official position of the right of government on the debates or polemics of the moment.

-

Mocked, treated as a "rightward" opportunistic (except that the term "rightward" was invoked for each posture ever so slightly nonlinear Sarkozy for five years), this program has enabled Sarkozy to return to 48% and reappropriate the traditional electorate of the lines (but also non-aligned and sitters), became skeptical and sometimes income from afar. It is especially the slogans that have reassured, but also the opportunity to offer voters a breach of the National Front, even fake or ridiculous on their favorite subjects. It was, notably, the renegotiation about Schengen having earned the respect of Merkel and Europeanists, Sarkozy might have more incentive to some inflections. He could also turn into French Orban, liberal and Atlanticist mode, this is certainly what he has left fool. Brilliant operation and probably not so vain, as well as Sarkozy has restored one horizon to the traditional right. She will get it back if it understands its objective interest instead of being absorbed by the illusion "centrist-humanist." Smooth and well in all respects, this label is a seductive trap that will lead to failure (electoral course, especially ideological) and abandonment of any influence on the political game (when these centrist-Humanists believe just the opposite ).

-

The UMP can still pull the Legislative honorably, but it will struggle to transform the test (the test being the meteoric rise of Sarkozy, who was able to remobilize the right and center and pick up undecided). The mainstream right will probably lose this election, maybe there will he a new wave of pink that will justify patronizing comments about the strategy of the UMP since the entry of Sarkozy in the campaign (ie to say there are two and a half months). But they are wrong, it's just that voters believe little practicality of promised reforms, or do not believe that the leadership of the UMP can hold such momentous events. To break free of European absolutism, Sarkozy has succeeded, in the period between the election, emerging as the most likely to default and even if it is cruelly absurd, to be as sincere and decided. A jump-off but still impressive, in fact almost half (an exit poll of polls forward the figure of 51%) of FN voters voting Sarkozy tried, perhaps with the energy of despair or a timid hope, but they did it nonetheless, even if mistaken.

-

The goalie takes comfort her beautiful displays

Mélenchon will never cease to use the weapons system to exist. The assumption of duel Navy / Méluche is now reality, the application being validated this Saturday. Until Thursday, Mélenchon knew where he would be catapulted, he even clutched alliances claimed (not negotiated) to Martine Aubry. After the first round yet again denied that scoundrel of legislative interest for him personally (up to minimize his involvement). Today, he calls on the lands of Marine Le Pen to sustain the good displays "populist", already promoted during its emergence (including face-to-face at the table of JJ Bourdin). It's fun, it's sad too. From the outset, Mélenchon reaffirms its old fads in animalizing its competitor, including asking him to come "barking" before him. He claims the debate, while retaining its uncouth ways and now the cleavage anti-riche/anti-immigré which would separate the radical left of extreme right ... even though Le Pen has been much more consistent, pugnacious and especially in concrete, not only his denunciation of the insidious normalization of the debt crisis (perceived through the media for granted), but it is also provided comprehensive solutions and accurate (to repeal the 1973 Act including ).

-

Despite this, it is this same theater that is fooled again staged. And the system sends back to back both sides "radical", dedicating the two characters as representatives of movements on the fringes of consensus, as two spectacular growths. In this clash of "extreme", embodies the side Mélenchon "utopian", the ideal that training can not afford more reasonable, too busy with the principle of reality. At the other end of the ring and of the exchequer, MLP is the real threat and ultimately, the receptacle of all the most unspoken gag, one that generates the debates that hurt, the one that enters into a forbidden world and Blinding raises prospects as they are lifting themselves out of the rational framework of reason and democracy. This is where the mental images which are fixed and sculpted in the minds of French.

-

In addition, there are pure political issues that the mainstream media does not arise and that the alternative media does not pose (by mélenchonisme this is the case-AgoraVox, disinterest, or because the news is too large and alive in this post-election period coupled with an acceleration of the Western crisis).

-

So here they are: FDG remain there a structure, a broad space for cooperation on the left? Or is it doomed to be a gathering spot? Will he torpedoed by the selfishness of the PCF elected or cowardice of Mélenchon - the two have already been announced? Is there also still a Left Front, an hour or Mélenchon and his acolytes struggle to find agreements and constituencies? In short, the Left Front label does exist still after the Legislative? And if that's the case, is that the movement orchestrated by Jean-Luc Melenchon not become one of FN comfort of a majority center-left (EELV sweeping frameworks for Satellite Modem)?

-

Joined the opportunistic

Eternal loser, Bayrou is the spectator of his own downfall. Here is a man hoping to fix the intersection of politics but its neighbors fly and his distant opponents despise. Evoking the "danger" of a cohabition the brave centrist did the job, no force and no apparent shift in public opinion or policy demanded. Splendid reversal jacket, from one of the best propagandists of the idea, schematic and simplistic but not innocent, that Holland would ruin France.

-

To justify this approach, invoking reasons of value rather than politics, economics. The truth is that Bayrou is the realpolitik in his personal scale and Europeanism beat of his Socialist Party makes it easy. Moreover, Bayrou has offered the winner announced at the camp, hoping to participate in its electoral success, but he has created no interdependence, the PS and Holland owe him nothing, he is simply at their feet no longer able to return on his right, since he left. His rallying, making it only exists for him (he has no integrated team) broke an unspoken in his favor: having still not officially switched to the center-left, Bayrou kept his chances of recovering the fugitives moderate, liberal and "humanistic" post-Sarkozy. He still missed his chance and is still wallowing in the depths of an abyss, facing slope probably even harder to climb (and more with feeling, for voters, that now it is even more sentence).