FN OF THE FUTURE

FN THE FUTURE: DOUBLE OR NOTHING

3

June

The post-2012 FN is he a great movement of popular emancipation or as servant of the liberal right, a new lure? This is probably the biggest dilemmas in this election year that was one of the last opportunities to reverse or at least slow down the process and the current hegemonies. While it can be sorry for reasons of ideology (the flirtations of questionable Jean-Marie Le Pen), conceptual (including the internal contradictions of Gaullism and liberalism) or pragmatic (difficult to assume a liability and distrust as a peremptory), the National Front is the only tool that can capture the French to serve their own interests (interests or interest patriots "class" for all of them). But for the people can take ownership of the FN by ignoring the requirements of mass given by some financial elites, media and cultural, must become the FN itself fully transverse movement, or exaggerated postures on moral issues and society are relegated to the background. The electorates of the FN must overcome their petty differences, whether on religion, the sacred design, school, manners, or even the secular principles of secularism, the device must be taken into account but to bow to Essentially, popular sovereignty and national independence. Because of these concepts depend for their lives, that is where the immediate emergency.

Assimilated to a FN and denatured by the band Cope?

Major risk: the FN post-2012 may become the wing of a rural-populist right-wing neoliberal, currently at the helm (although she, two weeks ago, sold the place to its equivalent societally and nationally lax ). The substitution block which will assume the position of the UMP could use this FN growing to become his crutch and an opening deposit of proving his good faith. By the way one side of the PS and its satellites on the other, such a right government can allocate roles and increase the sensitivity of an edge to the other: on the sidelines of the Liberal UMP, the FN has role of populist right, xenophobic and archaic, a kind of Pandora's box perpetually touched to better serve the game of left / right split. But there is no question of nuance: UMP and FN do not belong to the same political universe and there is little that locally (with elected modest in scope) that can create bridges without the FN is compromised.

Granting him bail "People", making the movement of man's daily while it is he who lies down in front of the best silversmiths of his disposition, the FN may become the plaything of the UMP and extension of the entire political system. A toy that is more accountable, accessing hands-strained as many gifts that will be poisoned or symbolic acts: notorious positions through alliances, Proportional share.

This would be an FN legitimized, and actually dédiabolisé longer quite as "extreme right", but more dangerous and damaging than ever, since it would share power to abandon his fights and methodically set national disguising the excess cravings under control, anti-intellectualism, anti-elitism and anti-Parisian. Now established, the National Front would be less easy to overwhelm and criticism would be nuanced, but with paradoxical argument: that FN would be assimilated to the UMP party "fascist" but reasonable, respected as standardized as far as the economic and social the key to integration is the abandonment of the policy intent for the benefit of the posture (or join the theater performers and directors to play the fools and idealists).

Renovation of FN: setbacks and doubts of Marine Le Pen

If the candidacy of Le Pen has suggested a possible breakdown and raised hopes, the last part of his first year as head of the opposition "to the UMPS", that is to say the time of the campaign intensive, making more skeptical. On several occasions, MLP seemed to ruin everything, not so much "back to basics" as like to say to journalists every small projection controversy, but while surfing Islamophobia rampant populism and small-time, or peripheral subjects justly! - take precedence and the effusions of counters are legitimized without further ado or critical or analytical.

In his criticism of Globalism and above all, very concretely, the alienation of people from debt and neoliberal economic principles, Marine Le Pen has considerably expanded and clarified the global discourse of the FN. These new views, or more elaborate, which made its offer richer and more credible, owe much to his entourage recently, the former top chevènementiste Philippot, one could also find opportunities very "soraliennes". But in February-March, when a downturn in the polls, this shift reaches its breaking point, either the general public equates gently-new FN, which is nearing completion, is Le Pen returns to the themes most trivial or offensive. The choice is agonizing, especially since about Marine Le Pen, usually ridiculed or condemned, are considered condescending, each rushing to declaim how he judges his economic agenda absurd or silly - never, of course, support the judgment by some details (Lapix tries to handle it but chooses a partial approach, plunging into the details sparse, pointing calculations without mentioning the principles). Otherwise, the appearance of showman MLP is highlighted, as well as its spread most brutal; extras to boost the animation. JM Le Pen is rather drape for his candidate, relatives of Gollnisch quitters and slanderers (feeding the resentment of the traditionalists and readers Rivarol towards Marine Le Pen), and then there Mélenchon, the unexpected spare wheel and Cerberus comfort.

Since then, Marine Le Pen has often seemed to yield to his wing populist reaction, or at least give it priority in the hierarchy of subjects. It is illustrated in which national-republican, sometimes acrimonious or bitter, leaving a particular given its economic program and alternative protectionist be minimized; she turns away to let his lieutenants (the shy Nicolas Bay or underestimated Julian Sanchez). On or contradiction: during the validation of MES on the sly, she holds the same windfall, the treason of the elites and politicians that the acting is the paragon of termination, as a general point of view (in training as protest or anti-European) and specific ("europe-strainer" - a term adopted unchanged by Sarkozy for the purposes of the second round). Indeed, it strongly condemns ... punctually; then nothing and it is soon time to deflect the Halal. By this diversion, Marine Le Pen has accommodated the role of populist right service. This is less a character part of that circumstance, because it accounts for the lack of a better, both by strategy and need to make some concessions to a "system" that arises when precisely the restricted designs consistent and really offensive.

Except that the inconsistency is there, revealing the limits, perhaps the courage or sincerity will claim some, but especially the flexibility of Marine Le Pen. Despite its independence and well-oiled machine that supports it, it is not (yet?) Able to develop his mind and assert its ambitions.

Thus, the opening of the FN mainstream media is, and it was Louis Aliot invites you on France2. Aliot, the redneck "right", caricature of middle-class poor and managed through its network of rednecks rolling his shoulders, is received on all trays, hosted in the prestigious morning radio, possibly inviting himself to table intellectuals and polemicists to be ambassador of the National Front and 18% of voters on which it is likely to rely, in general, to legitimize its basic lubbies. Hunting-type money-Beaujolais-antiburka. Aliot is the embodiment of this right rancid, cynical and materialistic, which is the bridge between the FN and the UMP: besides, he is careful not to devalue the UMP, preferring to "left" deviance, while confusing, until the inconsistency, all components of this enemy fixed and free. Leaving such rhetoric to grow within it, the FN risk, of itself, confinement in dualities and patterns of "system" that we abhor, yet we can not borrow its tools to the one we is also tailored its inversion. Qualifications of "red", the "Bolsheviks" or "communist" fuse, which is understandable on the part of Jean-Marie Le Pen, who in his youth and during his political career, saw the hegemony of USSR and the vertigo of communism. But when Louis Aliot made this archaic Left, which is more marginal and deprived of its substance, a threat, is the grotesque and the absolute diversion. For thus he chooses an easy opponent, consensus see squarely nonexistent, absolutist communism mentioned that no longer exists in the fantasies of redneck right financial or right retrograde. These two lines antisocial, confused ignorance and popular spirit, freedom and voluntary transfer and which are inconsistent with both the majority line of Jean-Marie Le Pen than Le Pen. The problem of the clan Le Pen, it's his evil offspring, which had better take care of the window rather than trying to take ownership of the store.

Flat encephalogram conceptual and depression: the rednecks are on each side

http://zogarok.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/le-fn-de-demain-quitte-ou-double/